Mind the Gap: Difference between revisions
More actions
m 1 revision imported |
m Text replacement - "{{StructuredQuote" to "{{Opening_Quote" |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Episode_Infobox | ||
| title = Mind the Gap | | title = Mind the Gap | ||
| caption = | | caption = | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| release_date = September 13, 2016 | | release_date = September 13, 2016 | ||
| length = 01:22:28 | | length = 01:22:28 | ||
| listen = | | listen = [[File:Episode-98-mind-the-gap.mp3]] | ||
| quote_source = | | quote_source = | ||
| opening_subject = | | opening_subject = | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| previous_episode = [[Dogmatic Slumber Party]] | | previous_episode = [[Dogmatic Slumber Party]] | ||
| next_episode = [[Mockingbirds, Destructo-Critics, and Mr. Robot]] | | next_episode = [[Mockingbirds, Destructo-Critics, and Mr. Robot]] | ||
}} | }}<!-- | ||
-->'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 98th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on September 13, 2016. | |||
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 98th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on September 13, 2016. | |||
== Opening Quote == | == Opening Quote == | ||
{{ | {{Opening_Quote | ||
| text = | | text = | ||
| speaker = | | speaker = | ||
Latest revision as of 18:06, 21 March 2026
Mind the Gap is the 98th episode of the Very Bad Wizards podcast, released on September 13, 2016.
Opening Quote
edit edit source
Show Notes
edit edit sourceDavid and Tamler break down the biggest question in moral philosophy -- can we derive value judgments from a set of purely factual claims? Like the Scottish Philosopher David Hume they're surprised when the usual copulation of propositions 'is' and 'is not' suddenly turn into conclusions in the form of 'ought' and 'ought not.' And what's the deal with all these copulating propositions anyway? Aren't they a little young for that? Do propositions practice safe copulation? Is proposition porn about to be the new fad? They also talk about Moore's Open Question Argument, which introduced the term "naturalist fallacy," and respond to angry criticism over last episode's Rationalia segment.