Pure Linguistic Chauvinism: Difference between revisions
More actions
m Text replacement - "The main segment is a discussion on ." to "" |
m Text replacement - "{{StructuredQuote" to "{{Opening_Quote" |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| release_date = November 26, 2019 | | release_date = November 26, 2019 | ||
| length = 02:04:59 | | length = 02:04:59 | ||
| listen = | | listen = [[File:Episode-177-pure-linguistic-chauvinism.mp3]] | ||
| quote_source = | | quote_source = | ||
| opening_subject = | | opening_subject = | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| previous_episode = [[Split-Brains and the (Dis)Unity of Consciousness]] | | previous_episode = [[Split-Brains and the (Dis)Unity of Consciousness]] | ||
| next_episode = [[Borges' Obsession-Obsession ("The Zahir")]] | | next_episode = [[Borges' Obsession-Obsession ("The Zahir")]] | ||
}} | }}<!-- | ||
-->'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 177th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on November 26, 2019. | |||
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 177th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on November 26, 2019 | |||
== Opening Quote == | == Opening Quote == | ||
{{ | {{Opening_Quote | ||
| text = | | text = | ||
| speaker = | | speaker = | ||
Latest revision as of 18:06, 21 March 2026
Pure Linguistic Chauvinism is the 177th episode of the Very Bad Wizards podcast, released on November 26, 2019.
Opening Quote
edit edit source
Show Notes
edit edit sourceTamler learns something new about menstruation. David weighs in on the democratic debates and the impeachment hearings. Then we map the various social and political factions onto the factions in our respective fields. Who are establishment neoliberals of philosophy, and who are the white feminists? What about the IDWs of psychology – and the Chads and Stacys? Finally we get serious and break down the article by Alan Fiske in Psychological Review called "The Lexical Fallacy in Emotion Research." Does language affect how we understand the emotional landscape? Do the words we happen to use deceive us into thinking we have "carved nature at its joints"? What is a natural kind anyway when it comes to emotions? Plus, after the outro, a quick unedited Mr. Robot discussion of the revelation in season 4, episode 7. Sponsored By: GiveWell: This holiday season, open your heart to those in need, and consider donating through Givewell.org. Givewell.org is an organization that cares about finding the most effective charities in the world, so that you can make each charitable dollar work as hard as possible. And for our listeners who are first time donors, Givewell.org will match your donation (up to $1,000). Promo Code: Verybadwizards Support Very Bad Wizards
- GiveWell
- This holiday season, open your heart to those in need, and consider donating through Givewell.org. Givewell.org is an organization that cares about finding the most effective charities in the world, so that you can make each charitable dollar work as hard as possible. And for our listeners who are first time donors, Givewell.org will match your donation (up to $1,000).
- Support Very Bad Wizards
- Fiske, A. P. (2019). The lexical fallacy in emotion research: Mistaking vernacular words for psychological entities. Psychological review.
- UCLA Anthropology
- Natural Kinds (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
- Mr. Robot" 407 Proxy Authentication Required (TV Episode 2019) - IMDb