Dishonesty, Character, and Dan Ariely: Difference between revisions
From Very Bad Wiki
More actions
m Text replacement - "The main segment is a discussion on ." to "" |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| release_date = November 12, 2012 | | release_date = November 12, 2012 | ||
| length = 01:11:04 | | length = 01:11:04 | ||
| listen = | | listen = [[File:Episode-8-dishonesty-character-and-dan-ariely.mp3]] | ||
| quote_source = | | quote_source = | ||
| opening_subject = | | opening_subject = | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| previous_episode = [[Psychopaths and Utilitarians Pt. 2 (Now with more poo poo)]] | | previous_episode = [[Psychopaths and Utilitarians Pt. 2 (Now with more poo poo)]] | ||
| next_episode = [[Social Psychology, Situationism, and Moral Character]] | | next_episode = [[Social Psychology, Situationism, and Moral Character]] | ||
}} | }}<!-- | ||
-->'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 8th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on November 12, 2012. | |||
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 8th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on November 12, 2012 | |||
== Opening Quote == | == Opening Quote == | ||
{{ | {{Opening_Quote | ||
| text = | | text = Get them suckas off the stage. They wack. They wack. | ||
| | | image = | ||
| | | speaker = Maybe from ''Wild Style'' | ||
| source = | | source = | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:07, 22 March 2026
Dishonesty, Character, and Dan Ariely is the 8th episode of the Very Bad Wizards podcast, released on November 12, 2012.
Opening Quote
edit edit sourceGet them suckas off the stage. They wack. They wack.— Maybe from Wild Style
Show Notes
edit edit sourceIn a Very Special Episode of Very Bad Wizards, Dan Ariely joins David to chat about cheating, character, teling your significant other about kissing someone at a conference, and the importance of moral rules. Tamler and David sandwich the chat with a discussion about the US Presidential election, the irony of moral psychologists making people do bad things, and end with a full-blown argument about what it means to say that something is morally wrong, and whether that's an interesting question.