Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Pain, Pleasure, and Peer-Reviewed Penises: Difference between revisions

From Very Bad Wiki
m Text replacement - "File:e.mp3" to "[[File:e"
Tags: Reverted ReplaceText
m Text replacement - "{{StructuredQuote" to "{{Opening_Quote"
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| release_date = May 31, 2017
| release_date = May 31, 2017
| length = 01:16:46
| length = 01:16:46
| listen = [[File:episode-116-pain-pleasure-and-peer-reviewed-penises
| listen = [[File:Episode-116-pain-pleasure-and-peer-reviewed-penises.mp3]]
| quote_source =  
| quote_source =  
| opening_subject =  
| opening_subject =  
Line 18: Line 18:
== Opening Quote ==
== Opening Quote ==


{{StructuredQuote
{{Opening_Quote
| text =  
| text =  
| speaker =  
| speaker =  

Latest revision as of 18:06, 21 March 2026

Pain, Pleasure, and Peer-Reviewed Penises is the 116th episode of the Very Bad Wizards podcast, released on May 31, 2017.



David and Tamler break down the latest small-stakes academic controversy--yes the one about conceptual penises. Does the recent "Sokal-like" hoax expose the ideological extremism of gender studies? Or does it show that certain portions of the "skeptic" community are susceptible to the same biases as their opponents? In the main segment they discuss the problems with measuring pain, pleasure, and happiness. When your doctor asks you to rate your pain between 1 and 10 and you say a 7, does your '7' reflect the same subjective experience as another person's '7'? (That depends--have you experienced childbirth?) How can we get more accurate readings of pain and pleasure across different people with different experiences? Most importantly, which number gets you the Vicodin? Support Very Bad Wizards