The Scandal of Philosophy (Hume's Problem of Induction): Difference between revisions
More actions
m Text replacement - "The main segment is a discussion on ." to "" |
m Text replacement - " The preroll contains the standard disclaimer and theme_music." to "" |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 294th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on October 08, 2024 | '''{{PAGENAME}}''' is the 294th episode of the [[Very Bad Wizards]] podcast, released on October 08, 2024. | ||
== Opening Quote == | == Opening Quote == | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 18 March 2026
The Scandal of Philosophy (Hume's Problem of Induction) is the 294th episode of the Very Bad Wizards podcast, released on October 08, 2024.
Opening Quote
—
Show Notes
CD Broad called induction "the glory of science and the scandal of philosophy." As a matter of habit, we're all confident that the sun will rise tomorrow morning and that we can predict where the planets and stars will be tomorrow night. But what's the rational justification for beliefs like this? According David Hume, there is none. Deductive justifications can't give you new information about the world, and inductive justifications are circular, they beg the question. David and Tamler dive into the notorious problem of induction and some (failed?) attempts to offer a resolution. Plus, an article about toddlers and small children who seem to remember their past lives – what should we make of these reports? And is "remembering a past life" and "being possessed by the ghost of that person" a distinction without a difference? The Children Who Remember Past Lives [washington post.com] Ian Stevenson - criticisms [wikipedia.org] The Problem of Induction [plato.stanford.edu] Salmon, W. C. (1978). Unfinished business: The problem of induction. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 33(1), 1-19.